![]() A minority also urged the board to take into account Trump’s posts from earlier in his presidency that “contributed to racial tension and exclusion,” but a majority chose to decide the case on more limited grounds. A minority of the board would have gone further and ruled that Trump’s posts were out of line not only as simple praise of the rioters but as a “call to action” inciting violence. The opinion reflected some dissent from within the board. Trump’s posts, there was a clear, immediate risk of harm and his words of support for those involved in the riots legitimized their violent actions,” the board said. You’re very special,” and the other calling them “great patriots,” and saying “remember this day forever.” 6, both praising people involved in the Capitol attack: one post telling the rioters, “We love you. Its decision focused on two Trump posts from Jan. The decisions of the board, made up of 20 members from around the globe, are not binding, but Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has pledged to abide by what it says. ![]() “These corrupt social media companies must pay a political price, and must never again be allowed to destroy and decimate our Electoral Process.”įacebook created the Oversight Board last year as a kind of "supreme court" to hear appeals from users like Trump who have had their posts removed or who want to challenge other sensitive or contentious moderation decisions. “The People of our Country will not stand for it!” he added.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |